Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra, and Robert Joseph Kunst, Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellants Maria Fernandez, Jose Manuel Ibarra, and Robert Joseph Kunst filed this accelerated appeal from the district court's final order terminating Fernandez's parental rights to her minor children, J.A.I., M.A.I., K.L.I., B.B.F., and C.I.F.; terminating Ibarra's parental rights to his minor children, J.A.I. and K.L.I.; and terminating Kunst's parental rights to his minor child, B.B.F. Appellants' court-appointed attorney filed briefs concluding that the appeals of Fernandez, Ibarra, and Kunst are frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See also Taylor v. Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646–47 (Tex.App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). Counsel has certified to this Court that she provided Fernandez, Ibarra, and Kunst a copy of the Anders brief addressing each appellant's respective grounds for appeal and a notice advising appellants of their right to examine the appellate record and file pro se briefs. No pro se briefs have been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's briefs and have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the order of termination.
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 03–10–00022–CV
Decided: July 08, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)