Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NNN Met Center 10–1, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–2, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–3, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–4, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–5, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–6, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–7, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–8, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–9, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–10, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–11, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–13, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–14, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–15, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–16, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–17, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–18, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–19, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–20, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–21, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–22, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–23, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–24, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–25, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–26, LLC; NNN Met Center 10–27, LLC; and NNN Met Center 10–28, LLC, Appellants v. BACM 2005–3 Met Center Office, LLC; Mark L. Patterson; Jeffrey J. Zissa; R. Terry Miller; E. Joe Berger, III; John A. Bain; Michael C. Elrod; Beverly A. Houston; Juanita Strickland; Janie Mucha; LNR Partners, LLC; and Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., Appellees
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from the denial of a temporary injunction to prevent a foreclosure of appellants' interests in an office building. The parties advise that although the property was sold at foreclosure on February 1, 2011, one appellant, NNN Met Center 10–25, LLC had filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California shortly before the sale. Citing events in the bankruptcy proceedings, appellants have filed a motion to abate this appeal until November 1, 2011. They attach an order from the bankruptcy court reflecting, among other things, that court's view that an automatic stay was in effect at the time of the foreclosure sale 1 and that it has extended the automatic stay until November 1 to afford the parties an opportunity to resolve the underlying dispute. In light of the automatic stay, we abate this appeal and dismiss appellants' motion as moot. See Tex.R.App. P. 8.
In addition to opposing abatement, appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal as moot, citing the February 1 foreclosure sale. In light of the bankruptcy stay, we may not rule on appellees' motion to dismiss. See Tex.R.App. P. 8.2; Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex.1988) (state-court action taken during bankruptcy stay is void). Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See Tex R.App. P. 8.3. It is the parties' responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs that would allow reinstatement. Id. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(b).
Bankruptcy
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.. FN1. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.
Bob Pemberton, Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 03–011–00029–CV
Decided: May 27, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)