Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GEORGE WADE DUKES APPELLANT v.
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
THE STATE OF TEXAS
STATE
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant George Wade Dukes attempts to appeal from his conviction for solicitation of sexual assault of a child under seventeen years of age, for which, pursuant to a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty and received three years' confinement.
On August 19, 2010, this court sent the parties a letter stating that the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal states that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We informed the parties that this appeal may be dismissed unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before Monday, August 30, 2010, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have received no response.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the appellate rules of procedure provides that in a plea-bargain case, an appellant may appeal only “those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial” or “after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.” Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Here, appellant waived all pretrial motions, and the trial court has not given permission to appeal. Because the trial court certified that appellant possesses no right of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).
PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ.
Tex.R.App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 14, 2010
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 02-10-00343-CR
Decided: October 15, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)