Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JARVIS DION KNOXSON APPELLANT v.
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
THE STATE OF TEXAS
STATE
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant, Jarvis Dion Knoxson appeals his conviction of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentence of fifteen years' confinement. In one point, Appellant complains that the trial court erred in admitting four previous convictions because they were not sufficiently linked to Appellant. We hold that the trial court did not err and affirm the trial court's judgment.
As no error is lodged with respect to the trial at the guilt-innocence stage, but solely with regard to the punishment phase, no discussion of the facts on the merits is warranted. We turn to the error raised.
During the punishment phase of the trial, the State offered into evidence nine previous convictions. Appellant objected to four of the previous nine convictions, and the other five previous convictions were admitted without objection. Regarding the four objected-to convictions, the fingerprints on these conviction exhibits could not be identified as those of Appellant. However, the exhibits do have Appellant's name, address-with a minor misspelling of the name of the street that Appellant lived on, and date of birth. Additionally, each objected to exhibit had Appellant's signature on it. The jury was free to compare those signatures to those on the other conviction exhibits. This evidence is sufficient to support the jury's finding that Appellant was linked to each of the objected-to convictions. See Flowers v. State, 220 S.W.3d 919, 921-22 (Tex.Crim.App.2007); Jones v. State, No. 02-08-00298-CR, 2009 WL 1905372, at *2 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 2, 2009, pet. dism'd).
We therefore overrule Appellant's sole point and affirm the trial court's judgment.
PANEL: GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.; and CHARLES BLEIL (Senior Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment).
Tex.R.App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 30, 2010
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2-09-139-CR
Decided: September 02, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)