UNITED STATES v. TEXAS (2021)

Supreme Court of the United States.

UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. TEXAS, et al.

No. 21-588 (21A85)

Decided: December 10, 2021

Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Solicitor General Judd E. Stone, II for the state respondent. Jonathan F. Mitchell for the private respondents. Heather Gebelin Hacker, Hacker Stephens LLP, Jonathan F. Mitchell, Counsel of Record, Mitchell Law PLLC, D. Bryan Hughes, Law Office of D. Bryan Hughes, Austin, Texas, Gene P. Hamilton, Vice President & General Counsel, America First Legal Foundation, Washington, DC, for intervenor-respondents. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Brian H. Fletcher, Acting Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Sarah E. Harrington, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Erica L. Ross, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Mark R. Freeman, Michael S. Raab, Daniel Winik, Kyle T. Edwards, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law