COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE v. BACA (2020)

Supreme Court of the United States.

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner v. Micheal BACA, et al.

No. 19-518

Decided: July 06, 2020

L. Lawrence Lessig, Counsel of Record, Jason Harrow, Equal Citizens, Cambridge, MA, Jason B. Wesoky, Denver, Co, Counsel for Electors, David H. Fry, J. Max Rosen, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for respondents. Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Eric R. Olson, Solicitor General, Office of the Colorado, Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Grant T. Sullivan, Assistant Solicitor General, Leeann Morrill, First Assistant Attorney, General, Michael D. Mcmaster, Assistant Solicitor General, Michael Kotlarczyk, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. De Cecco, Alexa D. Jones, Danny Rheiner, Assistant Attorney General Fellows, for petitioner.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2316, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2020 WL 3633779 (2020).

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case. Justice THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ––––.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law