Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dwayne CARTER, Respondent, v. Shatanyaer PITT, Appellant.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment dismissing the action.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action against his deceased mother's former tenant after defendant settled a holdover proceeding and moved out. Plaintiff sought to recover the sum of $4,800, representing use and occupancy for the period March 2017 through August 2017. After a nonjury trial, the court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $4,800, representing monthly use and occupancy of $800 for that period.
In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether “substantial justice has ․ been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law” (CCA 1807; see CCA 1804; Ross v. Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v. Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]).
Defendant argues that plaintiff does not have standing to sue for use and occupancy for the period March 2017 to August 2017 because the property defendant rented from plaintiff's mother has, at all relevant times, been owned by a trust. Indeed, the record demonstrates that the holdover proceeding was commenced by Izetta Brown, Trustee of the Faustine B. Carter Irrevocable Living Trust. Furthermore, a deed submitted by defendant on appeal, of which this court may take judicial notice (see Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Dev. Assoc., 22 AD3d 445, 447 [2005]), demonstrates that the Faustine B. Carter Irrevocable Living Trust took title to the property in 2011. Since defendant has made a prima facie showing that plaintiff does not have standing to bring this action, and plaintiff did not submit any evidence to show that he does have standing, the judgment failed to provide the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see CCA 1804, 1807; Ross v. Friedman, 269 AD2d 584; Williams v. Roper, 269 AD2d at 126).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment dismissing the action.
ALIOTTA, P.J., SIEGAL and TOUSSAINT, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2019-944 Q C
Decided: October 30, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)