Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony DESABATO, Appellant.
ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are reversed, on the law, the fines, if paid, are remitted, and the matter is remitted to the District Court of Suffolk County, Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, for all further proceedings.
The People charged defendant, in simplified traffic informations, with driving on the shoulder (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1131) and unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 509 [1]), respectively. Defendant pleaded not guilty. When defendant and his attorney failed to appear for the scheduled trial on June 26, 2018, the court entered judgments on default against defendant without conducting a trial, and sentenced defendant to fines. On appeal, defendant contends, among other things, that the default judgments are improper. We agree.
While Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1806-a (1) permits “a default judgment of a fine” to be entered against a defendant who has been charged with a traffic infraction but fails to “answer within the time specified,” the statute expressly provides that “[w]hen a person has entered a plea of not guilty and has demanded a hearing, no fine or penalty shall be imposed for any reason, prior to the holding of the hearing which shall be scheduled by the traffic and parking violations agency.” As defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges and requested a trial, and since no trial was held before the court entered the judgments, the judgments must be reversed (see People v. Cucceraldo, 64 Misc 3d 30 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019], lv granted 34 NY3d 979 [2019]; People v. Iverson, 63 Misc 3d 163[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50930[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019], lv granted 34 NY3d 981 [2019]; People v. Cole, 63 Misc 3d 149[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50729[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019]; People v. Hernandez, 62 Misc 3d 9 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2018], lv denied 33 NY3d 1032 [2019]).
In view of the foregoing, defendant's remaining contentions have been rendered academic (see People v. Iverson, 63 Misc 3d 163[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50930[U]).
Accordingly, the judgments of conviction are reversed and the matter is remitted to the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Violations Agency, for all further proceedings.
ADAMS, P.J., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2018-1930 S CR
Decided: August 27, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)