QUEENS ROOSEVELT MEDICAL REHABILITATION v. RESPONSE INSURANCE COMPANY (2019)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

QUEENS-ROOSEVELT MEDICAL REHABILITATION, P.C., as Assignee of Amador Gonzalez, Respondent, v. RESPONSE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

2016-1013 Q C

Decided: March 08, 2019

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ

Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP (Harlan R. Schreiber of counsel), for appellant. Law Firm of Natalia Skvortsova, PLLC (Natalia Skvortsova and Pryanka Arora of counsel), for respondent.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $ 30 costs, and defendant's motion to strike the complaint and dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3126 is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court denying defendant's motion to strike the complaint and dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3126.

For the reasons stated in Queens-Roosevelt Med. Rehabilitation, P.C., as Assignee of Maria Rodriguez v. Response Ins. Co. ( ––– Misc 3d ––––, 2019 NY Slip Op –––– [appeal No. 2016-1006 Q C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion to strike the complaint and dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3126 is granted.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law