Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael J. DANIELS, Respondent, v. CONEY MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellant.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
In this small claims action to recover $ 5,000 for damage to personal property, defendant initially defaulted and, following an inquest, a default judgment was entered on September 24, 2015 awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $ 4,250. Defendant's motion to vacate that default judgment was subsequently granted. Thereafter, defendant failed to appear for a trial date that had been marked final as against both sides, and a new default judgment was entered on September 29, 2016 in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $ 5,000. Defendant's motion to vacate that default judgment was denied by order entered December 1, 2016.
A defendant seeking to vacate a default judgment upon the ground of excusable default is required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; Puswald v. Adelphi Repair, Inc., 28 Misc 3d 134[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51347[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2010]; Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Stim, 13 Misc 3d 144[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 52320[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2006] ). “The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the sound discretion of the ․ Court” (Levi v. Levi, 46 AD3d 519, 519 [2007] ). Here, we find that defendant's moving papers failed to establish, with sufficient specificity, a reasonable excuse for its default. Consequently, the Civil Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant's motion.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2017-2107 K C
Decided: March 22, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)