Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas BOWEN-RAHAMAN, Appellant.
ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are reversed, on the law, the guilty pleas are vacated, the felony complaints are reinstated, and the matters are remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.
Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, defendant was initially charged, in separate felony complaints, with criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51) and assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]), class E felonies. Subsequently, the District Court purported to convert the felony complaints to misdemeanor informations, after which defendant pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]), and assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [3]), and he was sentenced to two, concurrent, five-month jail terms.
A review of the record indicates, and the People concede, that the felony complaints were not converted “into an information by notations upon or attached thereto which make the necessary and appropriate changes in the title of the instrument and in the names of the offense or offenses charged” (CPL 180.50 [3] [a] [iii]). A court's failure to adhere to the requirements of CPL 180.50 (3) (a) (iii) is a jurisdictional defect which cannot be waived by a guilty plea (see People v Smith, 71 Misc 3d 127[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 50225[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2021]; People v Taylor, 66 Misc 3d 149[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 50267[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2020]). Notwithstanding the fact that the prosecutor and defense counsel agreed to the reduction, as the District Court's attempted conversions of the felony complaints were not done pursuant to the requirements of CPL 180.50 (3) (a) (iii), they were invalid and the felony complaints remain pending (see Taylor, 2020 NY Slip Op 50267[U]; People v Kane, 57 Misc 3d 35 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2017]; People v Stinson, 22 Misc 3d 136[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52662[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008]; People v Spooner, 22 Misc 3d 136[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52664[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008]; People v Minor, 144 Misc 2d 846 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 1989]).
We pass on no other issue.
Accordingly, the judgments of conviction are reversed, the guilty pleas are vacated, the felony complaints are reinstated and the matters are remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.
EMERSON, J.P., GARGUILO and WALSH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2021-61 S CR
Decided: April 20, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)