Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GLENN A. BECKER, M.D., PLLC, Appellant, v. Michelle FILECCIA, Respondent.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
In this action, plaintiff, which is a professional limited liability company, seeks to recover the principal sum of $10,040.03 for unpaid medical bills. The unverified complaint alleges one cause of action which plaintiff has described as seeking a recovery in quantum meruit, and a second cause of action on an account stated.
After defendant answered the complaint, denying liability, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion was unopposed. In an order dated July 30, 2019, the District Court (C. Stephen Hackeling, J.) granted plaintiff's motion on the issue of liability, without specifying the cause of action upon which plaintiff had prevailed, and ordered plaintiff to submit papers for an inquest upon submission. After plaintiff submitted papers, in a paper labeled “Inquest Submission Date” and dated September 26, 2019, the District Court “ordered that the inquest is denied,” upon a finding that plaintiff had failed to prove its damages. Plaintiff appeals this decision. No judgment has been entered.
The September 26, 2019 paper constitutes a decision, and no appeal lies from a decision (see Greenfield v Tassinari, 8 AD3d 529 [2004]; Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]; see also Matter of Marinho v Apolinario, 201 AD3d 721 [2022]). Even if the September 26, 2019 document could be deemed to be an order, the paper is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made upon notice (see UDCA 1702 [a] [2]; Rene v Abrams, 193 AD3d 1001 [2021]; Reyes v Eleftheria Rest. Corp., 162 AD3d 808 [2018]; see also Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335 [2003]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
DRISCOLL, J.P., VOUTSINAS and WARHIT, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2021-343 S C
Decided: May 23, 2022
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)