Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David FLORES, Appellant.
ORDERED that the appeal is held in abeyance, the application by assigned counsel for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted and new counsel is assigned pursuant to article 18-B of the County Law to prosecute the appeal;
Steven A. Feldman, Esq.
1129 Northern Blvd.
Suite 404
Manhasset, NY 11030.
Relieved counsel is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the newly assigned counsel. New counsel is directed to serve and file a brief within 90 days after the date of this order and decision. The People may serve and file a respondent's brief within 21 days after the service upon them of the appellant's brief. Appellant's new counsel, if so advised, may serve and file a reply brief within seven days after service of the respondent's brief.
Assigned counsel submitted an Anders brief setting forth the conclusion that there exist no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). A review of the record, however, reveals at least two nonfrivolous issues, i.e., (1) whether the charge to which defendant pleaded guilty was facially sufficient and (2) whether the plea colloquy was infirm, rendering defendant's plea unknowing, unintelligent or involuntary. We note that, assuming without deciding that the written waiver of appeal is valid in this case, both these issues are exempt from the waiver (see People v Henriquez, 73 Misc 3d 126[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 50875[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2021] [facial insufficiency]; People v Ayala, 55 Misc 3d 150[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50755[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2017] [plea]).
Accordingly, we hold the appeal in abeyance, grant assigned counsel's application to withdraw as counsel and assign new counsel to ascertain whether defendant desires to raise the issues set forth above, and to prosecute the appeal on defendant's behalf with respect to these, or any other, issues that can be identified.
RUDERMAN, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2019-1558 P CR
Decided: December 09, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)