Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Moshe Z. BERKOWITZ, Respondent.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, defendant's motion to vacate his guilty plea and dismiss the simplified traffic informations is denied, and defendant's guilty plea and resulting judgment of conviction are reinstated.
Defendant was charged in two simplified traffic informations with operating a motor vehicle without being restrained by a safety belt (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1229-c [3]) and operating a motor vehicle with a passenger in the vehicle who was not restrained by a safety belt (id.), respectively. On May 4, 2022, defendant pleaded guilty to one charge of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1229-c (3) in satisfaction of both charges. The court sentenced defendant to a $50 fine and a mandatory surcharge was imposed. Upon a second call of the case, the Justice Court vacated the guilty plea and dismissed the simplified traffic informations on the ground that the People had failed to provide requested supporting depositions. The People appeal.
Pursuant to CPL 100.25 (2), “[a] defendant charged by a simplified information is, upon a timely request, entitled as a matter of right to have filed with the court and served upon him ․ a supporting deposition of the complainant police officer.” If a timely request for a supporting deposition is made, the failure to supply one renders the simplified information insufficient on its face (see CPL 100.40 [2]), and subjects it to dismissal upon motion (see CPL 170.30 [1] [a]; 170.35 [1] [a];People v Nuccio, 78 NY2d 102, 112 [1991]; People v Kachalsky, 73 Misc 3d 138[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 51159[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2021]). Here, however, the record demonstrates that defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced before raising a claim that he had not received a requested supporting deposition. Consequently, by pleading guilty, this claim was untimely (see CPL 170.30 [2]; 255.20 [1]) and waived (see Kachalsky, 2021 NY Slip Op 51159[U]).
Accordingly, the order is reversed, defendant's motion to vacate his guilty plea and dismiss the simplified traffic informations is denied, and defendant's guilty plea and resulting judgment of conviction are reinstated.
GARGUILO, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2022-373 OR CR
Decided: June 29, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)