Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
336 14TH STREET, LLC, Appellant-Respondent, v. Amy GOFFIO-MAHABIR, Respondent-Appellant, and “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.
In this licensee proceeding (RPAPL 713 [7]) to recover possession of a rent-controlled apartment, occupant defends on the ground that she is entitled to succeed to the tenancy of her grandmother, the deceased tenant of record. Though occupant admits that she was absent from the subject apartment for certain periods in the two years preceding her grandmother's death, she claims that her absences were a temporary relocation, first, in order to obtain treatment for health issues at a facility and, following her release from the facility, to continue her recovery. Landlord appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court entered July 6, 2021 as denied the branch of landlord's motion seeking summary judgment. Occupant cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the order as denied the branch of her cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the petition.
Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, and should not be granted when there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Because there is a triable issue of fact regarding the reasonableness of occupant's explanation for her absences from the subject apartment during the two-year period preceding her grandmother's death, the Civil Court correctly declined to grant summary judgment to either party (see New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations [9 NYCRR] § 2204.6 [d] [1]; 92 E. LLC v Lee, 65 Misc 3d 137[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51678[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2019]).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, is affirmed.
WESTON, J.P., TOUSSAINT and BUGGS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2021-469 K C
Decided: November 18, 2022
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)