Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pablo LEONARDO, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, affirmed. The accusatory instrument charging petit larceny (see Penal Law § 155.25) was not jurisdictionally defective. Defendant's larcenous intent is reasonably inferred from allegations that he placed items of merchandise “in his backpack,” and “walk[ed] past the registers without paying for the items” (see People v. Olivo, 52 NY2d 309, 318—319 [1981]; People v. Brunson, 294 AD2d 104 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 695 [2002]). Contrary to defendant's contention, a shoplifter need not leave the store to be guilty of larceny (see People v. Olivo, 52 NY2d at 317–319).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570973 /14
Decided: April 17, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)