Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel CALDWELL, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered September 23, 2014, affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of driving while ability impaired (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[1] ) was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ). The inconsistencies in the testimony and other credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the trier of fact, and we find no basis on the record to disturb its findings.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570919 /14
Decided: April 19, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)