PEOPLE v. SOLLA (2018)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pedro SOLLA, Defendant–Appellant.

571088 /13

Decided: April 19, 2018

PRESENT: Gonzalez, J.P., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.

Judgment of conviction (Anthony J. Ferrara, J.), rendered May 21, 2013, affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ), which established that the knife recovered from defendant conformed to the statutory definition of a gravity knife. The officer demonstrated twice in open court that he could open the knife by using centrifugal force, created by flicking his wrist, and the blade automatically locked in place after being released (see Penal Law § 265.00[5]; People v. Sans, 26 NY3d 13 [2015]; People v. Neal, 79 AD3d 523, 524 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 799 [2011]; People v. Birth, 49 AD3d 290 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 859 [2008] ). Although defendant's expert testified that the knife could be opened by pressing a “thumb stud,” he also testified that the blade could be released by a simple flick of the wrist, which satisfies the definition of a gravity knife (see People v. Herbin, 86 AD3d 446 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v. Neal, 79 AD3d at 524).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network