Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

IN RE: J. A. E. (2022)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

IN RE: J. A. E., a Child. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. M. M. and A. C. E., Appellants.

IN RE: J. M. E., a Child. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. M. M. and A. C. E., Appellants.

IN RE: J. R. E., a Child. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. M. M. and A. C. E., Appellants.

A176365 (Control), A176366, A176367

Decided: January 26, 2022

Before James, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

George W. Kelly filed the brief for appellant A. C. E. Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Holly Telerant, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant C. M. M. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Parents appeal permanency judgments changing the permanency plans for their three children from reunification to adoption. They assign error to the juvenile court's determination that the children's permanency plans should be changed away from reunification, contending that the court erred in concluding that the children could not be returned to parents’ care within a reasonable period of time. In addition, with respect to their youngest child only, they contend that the juvenile court erred in determining that his permanency plan should be adoption and not guardianship. On the first point, having reviewed the record, we conclude that the court did not err in determining that the permanency plans should be changed away from reunification. On the second point, the juvenile court now has changed the permanency plan for parents’ youngest child to guardianship, so that issue has become moot and we do not reach it for that reason.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

IN RE: J. A. E. (2022)

Docket No: A176365 (Control), A176366, A176367

Decided: January 26, 2022

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard