Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Hamid Michael HEJAZI, Plaintiff-appellant, v. STATE of Oregon and Oregon Secretary of State, Defendants.
Plaintiff, who is incarcerated, sought to file an action against the State of Oregon and Oregon Secretary of State. He requested a waiver of fees to file the action and a waiver of sheriff's service fees because he was indigent. The trial court approved the waiver of filing fees but, without explanation, denied his request to waive sheriff's service fees. Plaintiff appealed the order denying his sheriff's service fee-waiver request. See, e.g., Hejazi v. Gifford, 314 Or. App. 534, 535, 499 P.3d 151 (2021) (denial of fee waiver for indigent plaintiff is appealable).
Despite never being served a summons, the Attorney General made a voluntary appearance as representative for the state and the Secretary of State, thereby waiving respondents’ right to service. De Foe v. De Foe, 88 Or. 549, 552, 169 P. 128 (1917) (the district attorney's “voluntary personal appearance at the trial * * * [is] equivalent to the service of [a] summons”); N. W. National Ins. Co. v. Averill, 149 Or. 672, 682, 42 P.2d 747 (1935) (“[S]ervice of a summons * * * is waived by a voluntary appearance.”). This, as plaintiff himself acknowledged in a letter to the trial court, caused his request for waiver of service fees to become moot. It also has the same effect on this appeal, because any decision as to whether the trial court's denial of the waiver was wrong or right would have no effect on plaintiff's rights.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A176160
Decided: December 22, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)