Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: D. M., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. D. M., Appellant.
Appellant appeals a judgment committing him to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms, based on a finding of mental illness. He contends that he is entitled to reversal because the record contains no return of service showing that he had been served with the citation before the hearing, as required by ORS 426.080 and ORS 426.090. Although appellant did not preserve that argument, he contends that this constitutes plain error. The state concedes that neither the trial court file nor the transcript of the hearing contains any evidence that appellant was served with the citation, and that appellant is entitled to reversal as this qualifies as plain error. We agree and accept the state's concession. ORS 426.090 requires the court to issue a citation that informs a person alleged to have a mental illness of specific rights, and ORS 426.080 specifies that the person serving the citation “shall, immediately after service thereof, make a return upon the original warrant or citation showing the time, place and manner of such service and file it with the clerk of the court.” See State v. J. R. W., 307 Or. App. 372, 475 P.3d 138 (2020) (reversing as plain error in same circumstances); State v. R. E. J., 306 Or. App. 647, 474 P.3d 461 (2020) (same). For the reasons set forth in J. R. W. and R. E. J., we exercise our discretion to correct the error.
Reversed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A176082
Decided: November 03, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)