Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2003-5
¶ 1 QUESTION 1: May a municipal judge retain that office after the judge's spouse is elected to the city council?
¶ 2 QUESTION 2: If, in the future, the spouse becomes Mayor with the right to appoint the municipal judge, must the judge resign?
¶ 3 FACT SITUATION:
1. The judge seeking an opinion has been a municipal judge in a rural community since 1996. The term of office is two years and the appointment is made by the Mayor.
2. The judge was last reappointed in 2002. Since that appointment, the judge's spouse has become a member of the city council.
¶ 4 Canon 2: “A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all of the Judge's Activities.
(A) A judge should respect and comply with the law at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”
¶ 5 WE ANSWER:
Question 1: Yes
Question 2: No, but may not be re-appointed by spouse.
DISCUSSION:
¶ 6 The answer to these questions involve not only Canon 2 and the appearance of impropriety, but also the provision of 11 O.S. § 8-106 dealing with the subject of nepotism and Canon 2A as it requires a judge to comply with the law at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
¶ 7 Title 11 O.S. § 8-106 provides, “No elected or appointed official or other authority of the municipal government shall appoint or elect any person related by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree to any ․ office or position of profit in the municipal government. The provisions of this section shall not prohibit an officer or employee already in the service of the municipality from continuing in such service or from promotion therein.”
¶ 8 It is not our function to construe statutes but it appears that the statute in question is so clear and unambiguous as applied to the fact situation that no interpretation is necessary and our answers comply with the provisions of Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
¶ 9 ROBERT L. BAILEY, Chairman,¶ 9 ROBERT D. SIMMS, Vice Chairman,¶ 9 MILTON C. CRAIG, Secretary.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 06, 2003
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)