OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GATWOOD (1997)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL et al. v. GATWOOD.

No. 96-2480.

Decided: April 30, 1997

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel. George Gernot, III and W. David Arnold, Toledo, for relator Toledo Bar Association. David W. Gatwood, pro se.

per Curiam.Upon review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. As a condition of any possible reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent must make restitution and must demonstrate that he is continuing his treatment for depression or that treatment is no longer necessary. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

PER CURIAM.

MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS J., not participating.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network