Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demetrius TIGGS, Also Known as DJ and Sourpatch, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kathleen B. Hogan, J.), rendered November 2, 2018 in Schenectady County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the first degree.
Defendant was charged by indictment with various crimes, including attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and criminal use of a firearm. In satisfaction of the indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the first degree and purportedly waived the right to appeal. Supreme Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to the agreed-upon prison term of 15 years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
Initially, we agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. The written waiver executed by defendant “is overbroad and inaccurate, and [Supreme] Court did not overcome the overbroad language of the written waiver by ensuring that defendant understood that some appellate and collateral review survives an appeal waiver” (People v. Devane, 212 A.D.3d 894, 895, 180 N.Y.S.3d 732 [3d Dept. 2023] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1110, 186 N.Y.S.3d 840, 208 N.E.3d 68 [2023]; see People v. McLaughlin, 208 A.D.3d 1556, 1557, 175 N.Y.S.3d 152 [3d Dept. 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1074, 183 N.Y.S.3d 789, 204 N.E.3d 425 [2023]; People v. Nisby, 207 A.D.3d 876, 876, 172 N.Y.S.3d 190 [3d Dept. 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 1189, 176 N.Y.S.3d 212, 197 N.E.3d 492 [2022]). In light of the invalid appeal waiver, defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence is not foreclosed (see People v. Clark, 209 A.D.3d 1063, 1065, 175 N.Y.S.3d 751 [3d Dept. 2022], lv denied ––– N.Y.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, 2023 WL 3378646 [Apr. 14, 2023]). That said, upon review of the record and considering all of the relevant circumstances, we do not find the sentence imposed to be unduly harsh or severe (see CPL 470.15[6][b]) and we decline defendant's invitation to reduce the sentence in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[3][c]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Lynch, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 111117
Decided: May 25, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)