IN RE: Chauncey GIRARD (2023)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kelly S. McKeighan, J.), entered August 3, 2022 in Franklin County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner, an incarcerated individual, was found guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules in a July 17, 2021 determination.  That decision was affirmed upon administrative appeal in a determination received by petitioner on July 29, 2021.  On December 22, 2021, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, and respondent moved to dismiss the petition as barred by the statute of limitations.  Supreme Court granted respondent's motion, and petitioner appeals.

We affirm.  A proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination must be commenced within four months of receipt of the final determination under review (see CPLR 217[1];  Matter of McCray v. Annucci, 205 A.D.3d 1273, 1274, 169 N.Y.S.3d 689 [3d Dept. 2022];  Matter of Stevens v. Bell, 197 A.D.3d 1474, 1475, 153 N.Y.S.3d 710 [3d Dept. 2021]).  “Such determination, in turn, becomes final and binding when the aggrieved party receives notice thereof” (Matter of McCray v. Annucci, 205 A.D.3d at 1274, 169 N.Y.S.3d 689 [citations omitted]).  Having received notification of the final administrative determination on July 29, 2021, the four-month statute of limitations expired on November 29, 2021.  As the petition and supporting papers were not filed until December 22, 2021, Supreme Court correctly dismissed the petition as untimely (see Matter of Stevens v. Bell, 197 A.D.3d at 1475, 153 N.Y.S.3d 710;  Matter of Loper v. Selsky, 29 A.D.3d 1183, 1183, 817 N.Y.S.2d 682 [3d Dept. 2006]).  Petitioner's remaining contention, even if properly before us, is without merit.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Ceresia, JJ., concur.