Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., etc., appellant, v. Anthony STRACCI, Jr., respondent, et al. defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Robert M. Berliner, J.), dated March 30, 2021. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of the defendant Anthony Stracci, Jr., pursuant to Real Property Law § 282 for an award of an attorney's fee, and awarded that defendant an attorney's fee in the principal amount of $6,793.60.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Anthony Stracci, Jr., pursuant to Real Property Law § 282 for an award of an attorney's fee is denied.
As set forth in a related appeal (see Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Stracci, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2023 WL 3486505 [decided herewith]), the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted those branches of the motion of the defendant Anthony Stracci, Jr. (hereinafter the defendant), which were to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered November 19, 2019, upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint, and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him. The defendant then moved pursuant to Real Property Law § 282 for an award of an attorney's fee. In an order dated March 30, 2021, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted the defendant's motion and awarded him an attorney's fee in the principal amount of $6,793.60. The plaintiff appeals from the order dated March 30, 2021.
In Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Stracci, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2023 WL 3486505, this Court determined that the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the defendant's motion which were to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Since the defendant no longer is a prevailing party for the purpose of Real Property Law § 282, he is not entitled to an award of an attorney's fee for a “successful defense” of this foreclosure action (Real Property Law § 282[1]; see Bank of Am., N.A. v. Destino, 138 A.D.3d 654, 655, 29 N.Y.S.3d 56).
Accordingly, we reverse the order dated March 30, 2021, insofar as appealed from, and deny the defendant's motion pursuant to Real Property Law § 282 for an award of an attorney's fee.
DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, CHRISTOPHER and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2021–03603
Decided: May 17, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)