Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE OF NEW YORK MORTGAGE AGENCY, respondent, v. Michael COSTANZA, appellant, et al., defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Michael Costanza appeals from an order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Howard H. Heckman, Jr., J.), entered December 4, 2019. The order and judgment of foreclosure and sale granted the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, to confirm a referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, confirmed the referee's report, and directed the sale of the subject property.
ORDERED that the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant Michael Costanza (hereinafter the defendant), among others, to foreclose a mortgage on certain property located in Bellport. After the defendant joined issue, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant, to strike his answer, and for an order of reference. By order dated November 27, 2018, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted the plaintiff's motion, struck the defendant's answer, and referred the matter to a referee to ascertain and compute the amount due to the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale. By order and judgment of foreclosure and sale entered December 4, 2019, the court, among other things, granted the plaintiff's motion, confirmed the referee's report, and directed the sale of the subject property. The defendant appeals.
The defendant's contentions, that the plaintiff's submissions in support of its motion for summary judgment were insufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, its compliance with RPAPL 1304 and the notice of default provisions of the mortgage, are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Glasgow, 206 A.D.3d 790, 168 N.Y.S.3d 331; Fnbn I, LLC v. DiTomasso, 199 A.D.3d 656, 657–658, 153 N.Y.S.3d 879).
IANNACCI, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2020–01873
Decided: April 26, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)