Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ahtwana M. SMITH, appellant, v. Maurice M. DIXON, et al., respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Danielle M. Peterson, J.), dated January 19, 2022. The order, without a hearing, dismissed the paternal grandmother's petition for custody of the subject children.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The paternal grandmother of the subject children filed a petition seeking custody. At the time the petition was filed, the children were residing with their maternal great-grandfather, who was granted temporary custody upon the consent of the children's custodian. In an order dated January 19, 2022, the Family Court dismissed the paternal grandmother's petition for lack of standing. The paternal grandmother appeals.
Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 72(2)(a), a grandparent has standing to seek custody of a child where the grandparent demonstrates the existence of extraordinary circumstances, such as “surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness, and unfortunate or involuntary disruption of custody over an extended period of time” (Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 546, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277), “or other like extraordinary circumstances” (id. at 544, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277; see Matter of Suarez v. Williams, 26 N.Y.3d 440, 446, 23 N.Y.S.3d 617, 44 N.E.3d 915; Matter of Seltzer v. Patterson, 193 A.D.3d 1057, 1058, 147 N.Y.S.3d 640). The nonparent bears the burden of proving the existence of such extraordinary circumstances, and only if the nonparent meets this burden does the court determine whether the best interests of the child warrant awarding custody to the nonparent (see Matter of Seltzer v. Patterson, 193 A.D.3d at 1058, 147 N.Y.S.3d 640; Matter of Sellers v. Brown, 155 A.D.3d 1047, 1048, 65 N.Y.S.3d 207).
Here, the paternal grandmother's conclusory petition failed to sufficiently allege the existence of extraordinary circumstances so as to warrant a hearing on that issue (see Matter of Schmitt v. Troche, 155 A.D.3d 739, 741, 64 N.Y.S.3d 91; Matter of Smith v. Cooks, 148 A.D.3d 814, 815, 49 N.Y.S.3d 158). Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition for lack of standing (see Matter of Smith v. Cooks, 148 A.D.3d at 815, 49 N.Y.S.3d 158; Matter of Maddox v. Maddox, 141 A.D.3d 529, 35 N.Y.S.3d 264).
The paternal grandmother's remaining contention is without merit.
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., IANNACCI, FORD and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022-01094
Decided: March 22, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)