Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Moshe Klein, etc., appellant, v. Richs Towing, et al., defendants, R & S Jamieson Auto Body, Inc., etc., et al., respondents.
Submitted—December 8, 2022
DECISION & ORDER
In a putative class action, inter alia, to recover damages for violations of the Rockland County Code, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Robert M. Berliner, J.), dated May 12, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the motion of the defendants R & S Jamieson Auto Body, Inc., and Rich Jamieson which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and denied the plaintiff's cross-motion for leave to enter a default judgment and to certify a class pursuant to CPLR article 9.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
“CPLR 5526 requires that a record on appeal contain the papers and exhibits upon which the order appealed from was founded. It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal” (Bruzzese v. Bruzzese, 203 AD3d 1007, 1010; see Wilmington Trust Company v. Buscemi, 207 AD3d 503, 505; Eleven Stars, LLC v. Central Baptist Church, 206 AD3d 884, 884–885; P.B. # 7, LLC v 231 Fourth Ave. Lyceum, LLC, 167 AD3d 1028, 1029). Here, the plaintiff argues that the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the motion of the defendants R & S Jamieson Auto Body, Inc., and Rich Jamieson (hereinafter together the defendants), which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and should have granted the plaintiff's cross-motion for a default judgment and to certify a class pursuant to CPLR article 9. However, the record on appeal does not contain the pleadings or any of the exhibits submitted in support of, or in opposition to, the defendants' motion or the plaintiff's cross-motion. Therefore, the record is inadequate to allow this Court to render an informed decision and the appeal must be dismissed (see Wilmington Trust Company v. Buscemi, 207 AD3d at 505; Eleven Stars, LLC v. Central Baptist Church, 206 AD3d at 884–885; P.B. # 7, LLC v 231 Fourth Ave. Lyceum, LLC, 167 AD3d at 1029).
DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, CHRISTOPHER and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2020–04961 (Index No. 35543 /19)
Decided: February 22, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)