IN RE: the Claim of Rochelle A. KASSENS (2022)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 11, 2019, which ruled, among other things, that Partnership for Response and Recovery, LLP was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Partnership for Response and Recovery, LLP (hereinafter PaRR) had a contract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to coordinate home inspection services in federally-declared natural disaster areas for homeowners seeking to qualify for federal government assistance.  Following Hurricane Sandy, PaRR deployed claimant as a home inspector in New York from October 2012 until April 2013.  Following claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, in two decisions, adopted the findings of facts and opinion of the Administrative Law Judge, finding, among other things, that an employer-employee relationship existed between PaRR and claimant, that claimant was entitled to benefits and that PaRR was liable for additional contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.  PaRR appeals.

In Matter of Stine (Partnership for Response & Recovery, LLP–Commissioner of Labor), 183 A.D.3d 973, 121 N.Y.S.3d 695 (2020) and (Matter of Jensen (Partnership for Response & Recovery, LLP–Commissioner of Labor), 178 A.D.3d 1258, 116 N.Y.S.3d 403 [2019], lv dismissed 35 N.Y.3d 1072, 130 N.Y.S.3d 429, 154 N.E.3d 15 [2020]), this Court affirmed the Board's findings that individuals utilized by PaRR to perform home inspection services, during the same time period and under materially indistinguishable circumstances, were employees entitled to unemployment insurance benefits and for whom PaRR was liable for additional contributions.  Notably, these two prior decisions encompassed the Board's finding as to “others similarly situated.”  Here, PaRR exerted that same indicia of control as found in those prior cases, including, among other things, providing training and an identification badge, setting the rate of pay and conducting quality control reviews.  Accordingly, as in the prior matters, substantial evidence supports the Board's decisions (see id.;  Matter of Tauscher Cronacher PE PC [Commissioner of Labor], 148 A.D.3d 1491, 1492–1493, 49 N.Y.S.3d 804 [2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 917, 2017 WL 3908410 [2017]).

ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Garry, P.J.

Lynch, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.