Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John D. QUINN, Deceased. Stanley Cohen, Appellant; v. Five Towns College, et al., Respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding to obtain letters of administration for the estate of John D. Quinn, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County (John M. Czygier, S.), dated September 14, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination in an order dated July 6, 2017, as amended by an order dated July 20, 2017, to dismiss the petition.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, upon reargument, the order dated July 6, 2017, as amended by the order dated July 20, 2017, is vacated, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, for the issuance of a decree granting letters of administration for the estate of John D. Quinn to a qualified person pursuant to SCPA 1001.
In this proceeding, the petitioner, the founder of Five Towns College, seeks the appointment of an administrator for the estate of John D. Quinn (hereinafter the decedent), a former member of the college's board of trustees. Prior to the decedent's death, the petitioner and decedent were parties in a number of actions that resulted in four appeals pending before this Court (see Cohen v. Cohen, Appellate Division Docket No. 2012–01889; Cohen v. Cohen, Appellate Division Docket Nos.2014–04423, 2014–05419, 2014–09711). Those appeals were automatically stayed pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a).
The Surrogate's Court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner lacked standing to bring the petition. The petitioner, in effect, moved for leave to reargue the dismissal of the petition, and upon reargument, the court adhered to its original determination.
Upon reargument, the Surrogate's Court should have found that the petitioner has standing to bring the petition. SCPA 1002(1) provides, in relevant part, that “a person interested in an action ․ in which the intestate ․, if living, would be a proper party may present a petition to the court having jurisdiction praying for a decree granting letters of administration to him or to another person upon the estate of the intestate.” In this case, the decedent was named as a party in the actions in which appeals are pending before this Court, and the petitioner, as a defendant in those actions and an appellant before this Court, has an interest in those actions. Thus, pursuant to SCPA 1002(1), the petitioner has standing to petition the Surrogate's Court for the appointment of an administrator for the decedent's estate.
Motion by the respondent Five Towns College to strike stated portions of the appellant's brief on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, dated September 14, 2017, on the ground that they improperly raise issues, facts, and theories for the first time on appeal, and for an award of costs and an attorney's fee. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 24, 2018, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that Point II of the appellant's brief is stricken and has not been considered in the determination of the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2017–09938
Decided: November 07, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)