Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JULIO RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Community Supervision, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting
Commissioner of Corrections
Calendar Date: January 23, 2018
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use after his urine twice tested positive for THC 50. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge and a penalty was imposed. Upon administrative review, the penalty was modified but the determination otherwise was affirmed. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge respondent's determination.
We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, together with the positive urinalysis test results and the related documentation, constitute substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt (see Matter of Blunt v. Annucci, 155 AD3d 1226, 1226 [2017], appeal dismissed and lv. denied _ NY3d _ [Feb. 13, 2018]; Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci, 153 AD3d 1495, 1496 [2017] ). While a date discrepancy indeed existed in the chain of custody section of the request for urinalysis test form, the correction officer who performed the test explained that this was a clerical error and confirmed that the actual testing dates and times were accurate (see Matter of Belle v. Prack, 140 AD3d 1509, 1510 [2016]; Matter of Green v. Annucci, 134 AD3d 1376, 1377 [2015] ). Accordingly, petitioner's challenge to the chain of custody is unpersuasive (see Matter of Blunt v. Annucci, 155 AD3d at 1226–1227; Matter of Lyons v. Annucci, 152 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2017] ).
McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 525302
Decided: March 08, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)