Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Deborah Bush, appellant, v. Stevenson Commons Associates, LLP, Esqs., defendant; State of New York, nonparty-Respondent.
Submitted—October 12, 2017
DECISION & ORDER
In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for housing discrimination, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Soto, J.), dated September 12, 2016, which granted the motion of nonparty State of New York to dismiss the claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“The Court of Claims has limited jurisdiction to hear actions against the State itself, or actions naming State agencies or officials as defendants, where the action is, in reality, one against the State—i.e., where the State is the real party in interest” (Morell v. Balasubramanian, 70 N.Y.2d 297, 300; Borawski v. Abulafia, 117 AD3d 662, 663; Starker v Trump Vil. Section 4, Inc., 104 AD3d 937, 937–938), as well as claims against a few other State-related entities as provided by statute (see Erie Blvd. Hydropower, LP v State of New York, 90 AD3d 1292, 1293; Public Authorities Law § 361–b; Education Law § 6224[4]; see also Plath v New York State Olympic Regional Dev. Auth., 304 A.D.2d 885, 886–887). Here, since the defendant is neither a State actor nor one of the State-related entities that may be sued in the Court of Claims, the Court of Claims properly directed dismissal of the claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2016–13029 (Claim No. 127704)
Decided: December 20, 2017
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)