Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Santo GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Joseph T. SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Gilpatric, J.), entered January 31, 2014 in Ulster County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Supreme Court denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and we now affirm, albeit on different grounds. Petitioner was convicted of numerous crimes in 1981, including attempted murder in the first degree, and is presently serving a lengthy term of imprisonment. He has already challenged that conviction upon direct appeal and in collateral proceedings, including in CPL article 440 motions and habeas corpus proceedings (see e.g. People ex rel. Gonzalez v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 86 AD3d 886, 886–887 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 802 [2011] ). Petitioner contended in a prior habeas corpus proceeding that the indictment against him was jurisdictionally defective (id.), and here again advances similar claims. We thus find that “[p]etitioner's arguments either could have been or were raised upon direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion and, as no extraordinary circumstances warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedure exist here, habeas corpus relief is unavailable to him” (id. at 887; see People ex rel. Fauntleroy v. Rock, 113 AD3d 982, 983 [2014], lv denied 22 NY3d 865 [2014]; People ex rel. Miller v. Rock, 109 AD3d 1062, 1062 [2013] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)