Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michelle H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Filandra C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Matthew H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Filandra C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Melanie C. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Filandra C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3)
Submitted—May 5, 2014
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the child Michelle H.
Seymour Zager, White Plains, N.Y., attorney for the children Matthew H. and Melanie C.
ORDERED that Yasmin Daley–Duncan, Esq., 386 Parkside Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., 11226, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the petitioner and the attorneys for the children shall serve and file their briefs within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By order on certification of this Court dated March 20, 2013, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person, with the appeals to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.
The brief submitted by the mother's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 U.S. 738) is deficient because it fails to adequately analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see Filippi v. Filippi, 109 AD3d 509, 510; Matter of Kenneth S. [Bethzaida P.-Kenneth S.], 104 AD3d 951; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 260). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled his obligations under Anders v. California, we must assign new counsel to represent the mother (see Matter of Dylan Mc. [Michelle M. Mc.], 95 AD3d 1016, 1017; Matter of Griffin v. Moore–James, 95 AD3d 1013, 1014).
Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record here, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of neglect and derivative neglect, and whether the hearing evidence was adequate to establish that the issuance of a final order of custody of the youngest child was in that child's best interests (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738).
SKELOS, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–02133 2013–02135 2013–02173 (Docket Nos. N–6790–12, N–6791–12, N–6792–12)
Decided: July 02, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)