Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of LUTICIA M. ROBERTSON, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: February 25, 2014
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 2013, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant, a certified nursing assistant at a nursing home, was terminated for misconduct (see Matter of Liebman [Commissioner of Labor], 20 AD3d 858, 859 [2005] ). Claimant was suspended and later discharged after an investigation revealed that she grabbed the arms of a coworker who was pushing a patient in a wheelchair, causing the coworker to lose control of the wheelchair, which crashed into some equipment in the hallway. As a result of this incident, the coworker suffered bruising and the patient sustained minor injuries. Significantly, “a physical altercation between coworkers, regardless of who initiates it, may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Shivpal [Commissioner of Labor], 309 A.D.2d 1135, 1136 [2003]; see Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 69 AD3d 1090, 1091 [2010] ). While claimant denied any inappropriate conduct and testified that she was only being friendly when she put her arms around the coworker, this created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Messado [City of New York—Commissioner of Labor], 76 AD3d 740, 741 [2010]; Matter of Eisenstadt [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 764, 765 [2004] ). Under the circumstances herein, we find no basis to disturb the Board's finding that claimant's actions in grabbing and injuring a coworker constituted misconduct, rather than “poor judgment” on her part (see Matter of Ripley [Buckbee–Mears Cortland–Commissioner of Labor], 284 A.D.2d 877, 877 [2001] ).
Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Rose, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 517370
Decided: April 24, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)