Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maureen E. Trapani, appellant, v. Windsor Garage, LLC, respondent.
Submitted—January 22, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated April 17, 2013, as, upon reargument, in effect, vacated the determination in an order of the same court dated October 26, 2012, denying that branch of the defendant's prior motion which was pursuant to CPLR 317 to vacate a judgment of the same court entered June 5, 2012, upon the defendant's failure to appear or answer the complaint, and thereupon granted that branch of the defendant's prior motion.
ORDERED that the order dated April 17, 2013, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in vacating the defendant's default pursuant to CPLR 317. That statutory provision permits a defendant who has been “served with a summons other than by personal delivery” to seek relief from a default upon a showing that it did not receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a potentially meritorious defense (CPLR 317; see Taieb v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 60 N.Y.2d 725; Franklin v. 172 Aububon Corp., 32 AD3d 454; Brockington v. Brookfield Dev. Corp., 308 A.D.2d 498; Samet v Bedford Flushing Holding Corp., 299 A.D.2d 404, 405). The affidavits submitted by the defendant in support of its motion set forth sufficient facts to warrant relief from its default under CPLR 317.
SKELOS, J.P., LOTT, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–05680 (Index No. 29399 /10)
Decided: February 19, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)