Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jonathan K. Smith, appellant, v. Imagery Media, LLC, et al., respondents.
Argued—April 19, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), entered June 22, 2011, as, upon an order of the same court dated April 29, 2009, striking the defendants' answer and granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, upon a decision of the same court (Marano, J.H.O.), dated January 5, 2010, made after an inquest on the issue of damages, and upon an order of the same court (Demarest, J.), dated May 19, 2011, confirming the decision, is in favor of him and against the defendants in the principal sum of only $205,000, and failed to award prejudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5001.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
“It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal” (Matison v. County of Nassau, 290 A.D.2d 494, 495; see Hazell v. State of New York, 81 AD3d 893, 893; Milowski v. Michael, 69 AD3d 909, 909; Nakyeoung Seoung v. Vicuna, 38 AD3d 734, 735; Singh v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 275 A.D.2d 740, 740). Although the plaintiff seeks review of the damages awarded in the judgment appealed from, he failed to include, inter alia, the full transcript of the inquest on the issue of damages. Since, under the circumstances, the record is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, the appeal must be dismissed (see Hazell v. State of New York, 81 AD3d at 893; Milowski v. Michael, 69 AD3d at 909; Robertson v. United Equities, Inc., 61 AD3d 838, 839; Nakyeoung Seoung v. Vicuna, 38 AD3d at 735; Gerhardt v. New York City Tr. Auth., 8 AD3d 427, 427–428; Matison v. County of Nassau, 290 A.D.2d at 495; Lowry v. Suffolk County Water Auth., 287 A.D.2d 551, 552).
RIVERA, J.P., BELEN, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–11478 (Index No. 500033 /07)
Decided: May 23, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)