Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Catherine Santucci, respondent, v Robert Santucci, appellant.
Submitted—January 19, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Quinn, J.), dated February 24, 2011, as, without a hearing, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to hold him in contempt for failure to satisfy his pendente lite maintenance and child support obligations.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing in accordance herewith and, thereafter, a new determination of that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to hold the defendant in contempt.
The Supreme Court improperly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to hold the defendant in contempt without first holding an evidentiary hearing regarding the defendant's assertion of financial inability to satisfy his pendente lite maintenance and child support obligations (see Domestic Relations Law § 246[3]; Greco v. Rodriguez, 28 AD3d 422, 422; Gifford v. Gifford, 223 A.D.2d 669, 670; Boritzer v. Boritzer, 137 A.D.2d 477, 477–478). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for such a hearing and, thereafter, a new determination of that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to hold the defendant in contempt.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–03357 (Index No. 31075 /08)
Decided: February 07, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)