Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Elvis Rodriguez, appellant.
Submitted—November 3, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), dated October 6, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on May 25, 2004.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.
The County Court erred in determining that the defendant was ineligible for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46. At the time the defendant filed his motion for resentencing he was in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, was convicted of a Class B felony drug offense under article 220 of the Penal Law that was committed prior to January 13, 2005, and was serving an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of more than three years (see CPL 440.46[1] ).
Contrary to the County Court's determination, the defendant's status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible for relief pursuant to CPL 440.46 (see People v. Paulin, 17 NY3d 238; People v. Phillips, 82 AD3d 1011).
Accordingly, the defendant is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, and the matter must be remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.
We note that since the appeal is from the order denying the defendant's motion for resentencing only, the defendant may not challenge his underlying plea on this appeal (see People v. Benoit, 83 AD3d 728).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–10908 (Ind.No. 03–00907)
Decided: November 22, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)