Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dawn Rumola, etc., appellant, v. Maimonides Medical Center, respondent.
Argued—September 22, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated November 21, 2008, which granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In 1998, Anna Rumola, as administratrix of the estate of Thomas Sharp, commenced an action against the defendant. On November 16, 1999, Anna Rumola died. In 2007 the Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 1021 to dismiss the action “with prejudice” due to the failure of the persons interested in the decedent's estate to move for a substitution within a reasonable time. Dawn Rumola, as “Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Sharp,” subsequently commenced this action based on the same transactions and occurrences as those in the prior action.
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Under the circumstances of this case, the dismissal of the prior action was for “neglect to prosecute,” rendering the exception to the statute of limitations in CPLR 205(a) unavailable to the plaintiff (see Andrea v Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C. [Habiterra Assoc.], 5 NY3d 514, 520; Flans v. Federal Ins. Co., 43 N.Y.2d 881, 882; Bauer v. Mars Assoc., 35 AD3d 333, 334; cf. Freedman v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 9 AD3d 415).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contention.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–11147 (Index No. 13270 /08)
Decided: October 11, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)