Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., appellant, v. Robert Del Col and Ted Doukas, respondents.
Argued—September 9, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), dated October 22, 2010, which granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPL 190.25 and 210.35(5) to dismiss the indictment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
By indictment dated February 4, 2010, the defendants were each charged with one count of grand larceny in the second degree. The prosecutor who presented the charges to the grand jury, a former Assistant District Attorney who had gone into private practice, had been appointed by the District Attorney as a “Special Assistant District Attorney” in January 2010, as indicated by a “constitutional oath of office” card filed with the County Clerk. The defendants moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that, among other things, the District Attorney lacked the authority to appoint the prosecutor who presented the subject charges to the grand jury.
Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court properly determined that the District Attorney lacked the authority to appoint the prosecutor who presented the subject charges to the grand jury (see County Law §§ 701[1], 702[1], [2]; see also Matter of Schumer v. Holtzman, 60 N.Y.2d 46, 53–54; Matter of Sedore v. Epstein, 56 AD3d 60, 63).
Moreover, “the crucial nature of the prosecutor's role vis-à-vis the Grand Jury, particularly in view of his discretionary authority, mandates a finding that prejudice to the defendant is likely to result from the presence of an unauthorized prosecutor before the Grand Jury” (People v. Di Falco, 44 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 488). Here, the County Court did not err in determining that dismissal of the indictment was warranted on the ground that the District Attorney lacked the authority to appoint the prosecutor who presented the charges to the grand jury (id. at 488; People v. Fox, 253 A.D.2d 192).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–10960 (Ind.No. 313 /10)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)