Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald J.P. Volino, et al., appellants, v. Carlo J. Calvi, respondent-respondent, et al., respondent.
Argued—August 16, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16–102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Carlo J. Calvi as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2011, for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidate for the public office of Mayor of the City of Yonkers, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated August 4, 2011, which, after a hearing, denied the petition to invalidate the designating petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
As a general rule, a candidate's designating petition will be invalidated on the ground of fraud only if there is a showing that the entire designating petition is permeated with fraud (see Matter of Ferraro v. McNab, 60 N.Y.2d 601; Matter of Harris v. Duran, 76 AD3d 658, 659; Matter of Drace v. Sayegh, 43 AD3d 481; Matter of Ragusa v. Roper, 286 A.D.2d 516, 516–517). Even when the designating petition is not permeated with fraud, the petition generally will be invalidated where the candidate has participated in or is chargeable with knowledge of the fraud (see Matter of Drace v. Sayegh, 43 AD3d at 482; Matter of Leonard v. Pradhan, 286 A.D.2d 459; Matter of MacDougall v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 133 A.D.2d 198, 199).
Here, the petitioners did not sustain their burden of establishing, prima facie, that the signatures on the designating petition of Carlo J. Calvi were permeated with fraud or that Calvi participated in or is chargeable with knowledge of such fraud. Accordingly, there is no reason to disturb the Supreme Court's determination denying the petition to invalidate the designating petition and dismissing the proceeding.
MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–07197 (Index No. 12938 /11)
Decided: August 16, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)