Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
People of State of New York, respondent, v. Gary Ruiz, appellant.
Submitted—May 12, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), dated May 27, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sexually violent sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The People met their burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the defendant's adjudication as a level three sexually violent sex offender (see Correction Law § 168–a[3], [7][b]; § 168–n[3]; People v. Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571). To the extent that the County Court failed to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its determination was based as required by Correction Law § 168–n(3), remittal is not required because the record in this case is sufficient for this Court to make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law (see People v. King, 74 AD3d 1162, 1162–1163; People v. Guitard, 57 AD3d 751; People v. Banks, 48 AD3d 656).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed 10 points under risk factor 1 for using forcible compulsion against the victim (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 8 [2006 ed] ) and a total of 40 points under risk factors 8 and 9 (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 13–14 [2006 ed] ). Moreover, the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 12 was appropriate (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 15–16 [2006 ed] ).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LOTT and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–05356
Decided: May 31, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)