Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Michael Johnson, appellant.
Submitted—March 29, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered November 18, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the fact-finder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410, cert denied 542 U.S. 946; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt with respect to two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 NY3d 633; People v. Tutt, 194 A.D.2d 575, 575–576; People v. Delvas, 181 A.D.2d 740, 740). A police officer, who had pulled the defendant's vehicle over for failing to use a turn signal, retrieved a loaded firearm from inside the vehicle, after he observed it protruding from a bag located on the front passenger-side floor. Under the circumstances of this case, the fact-finder properly invoked the “automobile presumption” pursuant to Penal Law § 265.15(3) in finding the defendant guilty of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–10943 (Ind.No. 3171 /06)
Decided: April 19, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)