Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jacqueline Ryan, respondent, v. Paul Levine, appellant.
Submitted-January 4, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Buse, S.M.), dated September 2, 2009, which, inter alia, granted the mother's application for an upward modification of her child support obligation to the sum of $355 bi-weekly, (2) an order of the same court dated October 15, 2009, which directed the entry of a money judgment in favor of the mother for child support arrears in the sum of $10,390.41, and (3) an order of the same court (Hoffmann, J.), dated December 11, 2009, which denied the father's objections to the order dated September 2, 2009.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated September 2, 2009, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated December 11, 2009; and it is further,
ORDERED that the orders dated October 15, 2009, and December 11, 2009, are affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the mother.
The father's significant increase in income, coupled with the mother's evidence regarding specific increased costs relating to the child's basic necessities, including shelter, medicine, and education, warranted an increase in child support based upon a substantial change of circumstances (see McMahon v. McMahon, 19 AD3d 464; Matter of Elia v. Elia, 299 A.D.2d 358; Matter of Staffanell v. Staffanell, 220 A.D.2d 751).
FLORIO, J.P., ENG, BELEN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-00519 2010-00521 2010-00523 (Docket No. F-3376-97)
Decided: January 25, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)