Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RANDI MM., Respondent, JOSEPH MM., Appellant.
Another, Alleged to
be Neglected Children.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: December 15, 2010
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Taub, J.H.O.), entered March 25, 2009, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10-A, to extend the placement of respondents' children.
The underlying facts are more fully set forth in our prior decision relating to one of the subject children (Matter of Randi NN. [Joseph MM.-Kimberly MM.], 68 AD3d 1458 [2009] ). Respondent Joseph MM. (hereinafter the father) and respondent Randi MM. are the parents of two children, who were born in 2005 and 2007, and placed in foster care as infants. The father appeals from a March 2009 permanency hearing order extending the children's placement.1 Inasmuch as the father has now surrendered his parental rights and has not challenged the voluntariness of that surrender, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Simeon F., 58 AD3d 1081, 1081-1082 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 709 [2009]; Matter of Vivian OO., 34 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]; Matter of Natasha F., 15 AD3d 788, 789 [2005]; see also Matter of Andrew L. [Cassi M.], 68 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2009]; Matter of Norbert YY., 28 AD3d 815, 815 [2006]; Matter of Raychael L.W., 298 A.D.2d 829 [2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 504 [2002] ). Moreover, there is no indication that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies under the circumstances presented here (see Matter of Vivian OO., 34 AD3d at 1085; Matter of Norbert YY., 28 AD3d at 815; cf. Matter of Melinda D., 31 AD3d 24, 27-28 [2006] ).
Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
FOOTNOTES
FN1. The father's notice of appeal is misdated. Nevertheless, we treat it as valid in the interest of justice (see CPLR 5520[c] ).. FN1. The father's notice of appeal is misdated. Nevertheless, we treat it as valid in the interest of justice (see CPLR 5520[c] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 507629
Decided: January 27, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)