Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: N. Picco and Sons Contracting, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. M. Patricia Smith, etc., respondent.
Argued-September 10, 2010
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Hollander & Strauss, LLP, Great Neck, N.Y. (Michael R. Strauss of counsel), for
petitioners.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Labor Law § 220(8) to review a determination and order of the Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor dated August 11, 2009, which adopted the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, inter alia, that the petitioner N. Picco and Sons Contracting, Inc., willfully failed to pay certain employees prevailing wages and supplements on four public works projects.
ADJUDGED that the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.
The petitioners commenced the instant proceeding more than 30 days after service upon them of the notice of the filing of the challenged determination and order in the office of the fiscal officer of the appropriate governmental entity, here, the Office of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor. Under such circumstances, the proceeding is time-barred (see Labor Law § 220[8]; Matter of Local 237, Int. Bhd. of Teamsters v Comptroller of City of N.Y., 259 A.D.2d 314, 314; Bolovis v. Polis Contr. Corp., 235 A.D.2d 323, 323; cf. CPLR 217[1]; Matter of Edmead v. McGuire, 67 N.Y.2d 714, 716; Matter of Lion Constr. Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 266 A.D.2d 394, 394-395), and must be dismissed.
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the merits of the petitioners' contentions.
MASTRO, J.P., SANTUCCI, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-08620 (Docket No. 08620 /09)
Decided: October 05, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)