Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert NIMMONS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After receiving a confidential tip that petitioner was carrying a weapon, a correction officer approached petitioner and observed him carrying a wad of tissue paper in his hand. Petitioner initially refused the officer's orders to drop the tissue paper, but eventually complied and a search of the paper revealed a razor blade wrapped in tape and covered by a sheath. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon and failing to obey a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. This determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, unusual incident report and the hearing testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Page v. Fischer, 64 A.D.3d 1067, 1067, 883 N.Y.S.2d 626 [2009]; Matter of Griffin v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 591, 591, 840 N.Y.S.2d 498 [2007] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, it was not necessary for the Hearing Officer to independently assess the credibility of the confidential informant inasmuch as the determination of guilt was based upon evidence independent of the confidential information (see Matter of Kirby v. Leclaire, 47 A.D.3d 1174, 1175, 850 N.Y.S.2d 300 [2008]; Matter of Hemphill v. Selsky, 26 A.D.3d 548, 549, 808 N.Y.S.2d 503 [2006]; Matter of Folk v. Goord, 307 A.D.2d 500, 501, 761 N.Y.S.2d 885 [2003] ). Finally, petitioner's contention that he was “set up” by correction officers presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (Matter of Vines v. Goord, 19 A.D.3d 951, 953, 798 N.Y.S.2d 526 [2005]; Matter of Toomer v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 860, 860, 736 N.Y.S.2d 763 [2002] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)