Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Debbie J. MONTANYE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a machine operator for the employer until she was terminated in February 2003. Her termination followed a meeting at which she became loud and disruptive, and accused her superiors of lying. Her claim for unemployment insurance benefits was denied on the ground that she lost her employment through misconduct and this determination was upheld by an Administrative Law Judge and later the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. It is well settled that an employee's insubordinate and disrespectful behavior toward a supervisor may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Pagan [Commissioner of Labor], 305 A.D.2d 845, 758 N.Y.S.2d 561 [2003]; Matter of Puente [Commissioner of Labor], 270 A.D.2d 555, 555, 703 N.Y.S.2d 585 [2000], lv. dismissed 95 N.Y.2d 896, 716 N.Y.S.2d 35, 739 N.E.2d 291 [2000] ). Claimant's supervisor testified to claimant's inappropriate and abusive comments during the meeting that culminated in the decision to discharge her. There is nothing to suggest that claimant's filing of a prior sexual harassment complaint had anything to do with her termination. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 30, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)